A speculation: could Balanced Positivity be used as a term to catch a range of other situations?

Let us consider a situation which may involve, say 40% toxic positivity, 30% toxic loyalty and 5% toxic forgiveness - along with sundry other issues, with some possibly being good aspects. 

To describe that situation, one could go into the multiple aspects, or ... could one perhaps describe it as a mixture of unbalanced positivities? 

Let’s now turn that around. 

What if a situation was 40% BPM positivity, 30% BPM loyalty and 5% BPM forgiveness - along with sundry other issues. 

To describe that situation, one could go into the multiple aspects, or ... could one perhaps describe it as a Balanced Positive mixture of various aspects? 

Just a speculation ...

Blessed Be

Gnwmythr (Kayleen), ShrineKeeper 

Sunday 16^th March, 2025 

Possible flaws 

Where I can, I will try to highlight possible flaws / issues you should consider: 

• there may be flawed logical arguments in the above: to find out more about such flaws and thinking generally, I recommend Brendan  Myers’ free online course “Clear and Present Thinking”;  
• I could be wrong - so keep your thinking caps on, and make up your own minds for yourself.
  

 

If you appreciated this post, please consider promoting it - there are some links below, and there’s also other options. 

Note that I am cutting back on aspects of my posts - see here. 

(Gnwmythr is pronounced new-MYTH-ear)  

Remember: we generally need to be more human being rather than human doing, to mind our Mӕgan, and to acknowledge that all misgendering is an act of active transphobia/transmisia that puts trans+ lives at risk & accept that all insistence on the use of “trans” as a descriptor comes with commensurate use of “cis” as a descriptor to prevent “othering” (just as binary gendered [men’s and women’s] sporting teams are either both given the gender descriptor, or neither).

#PsychicABetterWorld   and  

Copyright © Kayleen White 2007-2025     NO AI   I do not consent to any machine learning aka Artificial Intelligence (AI), generative AI, large language model, machine learning, chatbot, or other automated analysis, generative process, or replication program to reproduce, mimic, remix, summarise, or otherwise  replicate any part of this post or other posts on this blog via any means. Typo’s may be inserrted deliberately to demonstrate this is not an AI product.     Otherwise, fair and reasonable use is accepted under Creative Commons 4.0 on an Attribution-ShareAlike basis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/